Home  About Journal  Editorial Board  Instruction  Subscription  Contact Us   Message Board  
JMT 2011, Vol. 19 Issue (1) :26-34    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-087X.2011.01.005
Articles Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << Previous Articles | Next Articles >>
Comparative analysis on dynamic behavior of two HMA railway substructures
Mingjing FANG1,2, Yanjun QIU2, Jerry G. ROSE3, Randy C. WEST1, Changfa AI2*
1. National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT), College of Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36830-5577, USA;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China;
3. College of Engineering, Civil Engineering Department, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0281, USA

Abstract
Reference
Related Articles
Download: PDF (627KB)   HTML 1KB   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract A numerical analysis using a finite element program was performed on three structures:hot mix asphalt(HMA) reinforced trackbed(RACS-1),HMA directly supported trackbed(RACS-2),and traditional Portland Cement Concrete(PCC) slab track(SlabTrack).Although the comprehensive dynamic responses of RACS-1 were similar with SlabTrack,HMA layer can positively affect the stress distributions.In particular,the horizontal stresses indicate that the resilience of RACS-1 was improved relative to SlabTrack.In addition,HMA reinforced substructure has the capacity to recover the residual vertical deformation.The effective depth for weakening dynamic loadings is mainly from 0 to 2 m,this being especially true at 0.5 m.The results from the analysis show that HMA is a suitable material for the railway substructure to enhance resilient performance,improve the stress distribution,weaken dynamic loading,and lower the vibration,especially at the effective depth of 2 m.The HMA constructed at the top of the stone subbase layer allows the vertical modulus a smooth transition.In terms of the comprehensive dynamic behaviors,RACS-1 is better than SlabTrack,while the results for RACS-2 are inconclusive and require further research.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Mingjing FANG
Yanjun QIU
Jerry G. ROSE
Randy C. WEST
Changfa AI
Keywordshigh-speed railway   HMA   railway substructure   FEM analysis     
Received 2010-07-23;
Fund:

This paper is supported by NSFC project (No.50978222). The authors would like to thank Prof.Yongxing Wei for his assistance. Also, Ms. Rachel Nichols of University of Kentucky and Mr. Bill Minor of Auburn University are acknowledged for editing this draft and providing many useful suggestions.

Cite this article:   
Mingjing FANG, Yanjun QIU, Jerry G. ROSE, Randy C. WEST, Changfa AI.Comparative analysis on dynamic behavior of two HMA railway substructures[J]  JMT, 2011,V19(1): 26-34
URL:  
http://jmt.swjtu.edu.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.2095-087X.2011.01.005      or     http://jmt.swjtu.edu.cn/EN/Y2011/V19/I1/26
Copyright 2010 by JMT